Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
John Ingrassia and Larkin, Ingrassia & Tepermayster, LLP recently teamed up to persuade a Justice in a Local Criminal Court to suppress all evidence derived as a result of a DWI arrest. Mr Ingrassia’s cross examination of NY State Troopers at a pre trial suppression hearing established that the Troopers did not have reasonable cause to believe that his client operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. After the hearing, Mr. Ingrassia submitted a post hearing memorandum of law that successfully persuaded the Court to suppress all evidence of their client’s arrest.
We help suppress evidence against our client in a DWI hearing under the pretense that the officer didn’t have reasonable cause to believe the driver was intoxicated. This article is brought to you by Larkin, Ingrassia & Tepermayster, LLP.