Your case matters. We commit our full resources and attention to a successful result.

Challenging breath test results in New York DWI cases

Breathalyzer devices are not infallible. Neither are Intoxilyzers nor any other portable machine used to administer roadside breath tests to drivers whom police suspect of drunk driving. Such machines have been known to suffer from various calibration and human errors – leading to erroneous results.

Because the machines are fallible, it is fair game to require police to show they have a proper evidentiary basis for such tests when used at trial. In a recent DWI case involving breathalyzer evidence, however, the New York Court of Appeals has held that there are limits to a defendant’s ability to cross-examine documents that bear upon the reliability of breathalyzer devices.

The case concerned a man who was convicted of DWI in New York three years ago. He challenged the conviction under the confrontation clause of the U.S. constitution, which protects the right of criminal defendants to question those who present testimonial evidence against them.

The man argued that under the confrontation clause he should have been allowed to cross-examine the authors of reports on the functionality of the breathalyzer. Those reports were admitted into evidence at the trial. But the man was not allowed to question the technicians who prepared them.

The stakes were high for the man because he already had two drunken driving convictions on his record. He was eventually found guilty of felony DWI and sentenced to prison.

Though the confrontation clause argument was not successful for the defendant, the case does indirectly affirm that portable breath tests are not always accurate. Regardless of whether there is cross-examination of technicians who calibrate the devices, law enforcement must still show that they are in proper working order.

Source: “Breathalyzer documents not subject to Confrontation Clause: Court of Appeals,” Thomson Reuters News & Insight, Daniel Wiessener, 2-19-13

Important Information

COVID-19 (Novel Corona Virus)  Update 3-20-2020

By order of Governor Andrew Cuomo, beginning 3-22-2020, all non-essential business in New York state must close their physical offices in response to the rapid rate of positive reported cases of COVID-19 in New York State.

Although this will impact the in office and in person services that LIT can provide, we will still be working remotely from our homes to serve our existing clients and we will continue to serve the public on a remote basis with any new legal matters for which they may need assistance.

We as a nation have overcome great obstacles in the past and although the challenges that lie ahead of us as community, as a state, and as a nation are great, we will overcome them as our resilience as individuals, as a community and as a nation will allow us to prevail.

May all of you and your loved ones be safe and well .

Larkin, Ingrassia & Tepermayster, LLP

Should you have any questions please feel free to contact us at 845-566-5345

For more information regarding the COVID-19 virus please visit any of the following sites:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

NYS Department of Health

Orange County Dept. of Health

Ulster County Dept. of Health

For information and updates regarding court postponements or closings please visit:

NYS Unified Court System

9th Judicial District

3rd Judicial District